Positivismo reconsiderado

para além dos estereótipos anti-positivistas nas Relações Internacionais

Autores

  • Enzo Lenine Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
  • Marlon Rodriguez Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14244/agenda.2023.2.11

Palavras-chave:

Positivismo, Filosofia da ciência, Metateoria, Teoria das relações internacionais

Resumo

Como a filosofia positivista contribuiu para a consolidação da disciplina de Relações Internacionais, especificamente no que tange ao modelo de explicação dos fenômenos internacionais? Nesse artigo, recuperamos a história do positivismo, focando no Círculo de Viena, os princípios da filosofia positivista e o modelo explicativo dedutivo-nomológico. Utilizamos essa abordagem filosófica para analisar as contribuições do positivismo para as RI, nomeadamente no que tange à produção de explicações. Argumentamos que a consolidação da disciplina enquanto ciência dos fenômenos internacionais se deve em larga medida ao positivismo e aos seus princípios filosóficos para a construção do conhecimento.

Biografia do Autor

Enzo Lenine, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)

Professor no departamento de Ciência Política da Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA). Sua linhas de pesquisa envolvem: teoria da escolha racional e modelagem formal, filosofia das ciências sociais, feminismo nas Relações Internacionais e hierarquias do conhecimento. Possui publicações na International Interactions, Perspectives on Politics, Rationality and Society, Carta Internacional, Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política entre outros.

Marlon Rodriguez, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)

Graduando em Ciências Sociais na Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA). Pesquisa teoria da escolha racional e modelagem de conflitos internacionais. Foi bolsista PIBIC, bolsa CNPq, do projeto “Política doméstica e crises internacionais: proposta de expansão do modelo de custos de audiência”, sob orientação do professor Enzo Lenine.

Referências

ACHINSTEIN, P. The Nature of Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

ADLER, E. Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates. In: CARLSNAES, W.; RISSE, T.; SIMMONS, B. A. Handbook of International Relations. 2. ed. Londres: SAGE, cap. 5, p. 112-144, 2013.

ALMOND, G. A. Political science: the history of the discipline. In: GOODIN, R. E.; KLINGEMANN, H. A new handbook of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.50-96, 1998.

ARISTÓTELES. Órganon. São Paulo: Edipro, 2016.

AYER, A. J. Editor’s Introduction. In: AYER, A. J. Logical Positivism, 3-28. Nova Iorque: Free Press, p. 3-28, 1959a.

AYER, A. J. Verification and Experience. In: AYER, A. J. Logical Positivism. Nova Iorque: Free Press, p. 228-243, 1959b.

AYER, A. J.s. Language, Truth and Logic. Londres: Penguin Books, 2001.

BHASKAR, R. A Realist Theory of Science. Londres: Verso, 2008 [1975].

BLUMBERG, A. E.; FEIGL, H. Logical Positivism. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 28, n. 11, p. 281-296, 1931.

BUENO DE MESQUITA, E. Toward a scientific understanding of international conflict: A personal view. International Studies Quarterly, v. 29, n. 2, p. 121-136, 1985.

BULL, H. International Theory: The Case for the Classical Approach. World Politics, v. 18, n. 3, p. 361-377, 1996.

CLARKE, K. A.; PRIMO, D. M. A Model Discipline: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

CARNAP, R. The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Loical Analysis of Language. In: AYER, A. J. Logical Positivism, 60-81. Nova Iorque: Free Press, p. 60-81, 1959.

CARNAP, R. The Logical Structure of the World and Pseuproblems in Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court, 2003.

CARR, E. H. Vinte Anos de Crise: 1919-1939. Uma Introdução ao Estudo das Relações Internacionais. 2. ed. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília e Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, 2001.

CARVALHO, T.; GABRIEL, J. P. N.; LOPES, D. B. 2021. ‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Difference between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches. Contexto Internacional, v. 43, n. 3, p. 461-488, 2021.

CHAUÍ, M. Introdução à História da Filosofia, Vol. 1: dos pré-socráticos a Aristóteles. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2002.

CREATH, R. The Gentle Strength of Tolerance: The Logical Syntax of Language and Carnap’s Philosophical Programme. In: WAGNER, P. Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 203-214, 2009.

CREATH, R. Logical Empiricism. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). 2022. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/logical-empiricism/>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

DESSLER, D. What’s at stake in the agent-structure debate?. International Organization, v. 43, n. 3, p. 441-473, 1989.

DESSLER, D. Beyond correlations: Toward a causal theory of war. International Studies Quarterly, v. 35, n. 3, p. 337-355, 1991.

DOWDING, K. The Philosophy and Methods of Political Science. Londres: Palgrave, 2016.

DOWDING, K. Australian exceptionalism reconsidered. Australian Journal of Political Science, v. 52, n. 2, p. 165-182, 2017.

DOWDING, K.; LENINE, E. Models, Conceptual and Predictive: A Response to Johnson’s Models-as-Fables. Perspectives on Politics, v. 21, n. 1, p. 254-263, 2023.

DOWDING, K.; MILLER, C. On prediction in political science. European Journal of Political Research, v. 58, n. 3, p. 1001-1018, 2019.

DUNNE, T. The English School. In: DUNNE, T; KURKI, M.; SMITH, S. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 132-152, 2013.

FARR, J. Remembering the revolution: behavioralism in American Political Science. In: FARR, J.; DRYZEK, J.; LEONARD, S. T. Political science in history: research programs and political traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 198-224, 1995.

FEARON, J.; WENDT, A. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In: CARLSNAES, W.; RISSE, T.; SIMMONS, B. A. Handbook of International Relations. Londres: SAGE, p. 52-72, 2006.

GODFREY-SMITH, P. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. 2. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.

GOODMAN, N. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955.

HAWKESWORTH, M. Contending Conceptions of Science and Politics: Methodology and the Constitution of the Political. In: YANOW, D.; SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, p. 27-49, 2015.

HEMPEL, C. G. The Function of General Laws in History. Journal of Philosophy, v. 39, p. 209-227, 1942.

HEMPEL, C. G.; OPPENHEIM, P. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, v. 15, n. 2, p. 135-175, 1948.

HEMPEL, C. G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Nova Iorque: Free Press, 1965.

HINDMOOR, A.; TAYLOR, B. 2015. Rational Choice. 2. ed. Londres: Palgrave, 2015.

HOLLIS, M.; SMITH, S. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.

JACKSON, P. T. Making Sense of Making Sense: Configurational Analysis and the Double Hermeneutic. In: YANOW, D.; SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, p. 267-283, 2015.

JACKSON, P. T. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, 2016.

JACKSON, P. T. Causal claims and causal explanation in international studies. Journal of International Relations and Development, v. 20, p. 689-716, 2017.

KAPLAN, M. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relatons. In: ROSENAU, J. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 39-61, 1969.

KEOHANE, R. O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

KEOHANE, R. O. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, v. 32, n. 4, p. 379-396, 1988.

KINCAID, H. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Constroversies in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

KING, G.; KEOHANE, R. O.; VERBA, S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. New Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.

KIRKPATRICK, E. The impact of the behavioral approach on traditional political science. In: RANNEY, A. Essays on the behavioral study of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, p. 1-30, 1962.

KITCHER, P. Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, v. 48, n. 4, p. 507-531, 1981.

KURKI, M. Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

KURKI, M.; SUGANAMI, H. Towards the politics of causal explanation: a reply to the critics of causal inquiries. International Theory, v. 4, n. 3, p. 400-429, 2012.

KURKI, M.; WIGHT, C. International Relations and Social Science. In: DUNNE, T.; KURKI, M.; SMITH, S. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 14-35, 2013.

LEBOW, R. N. Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

LEBOW, R. N. The quest for knowledge in International Relations: how do we know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.

LENINE, E. Explanation as prediction: the raison d’être of formal models in political science. Política Hoje, v. 27, n. 1, p. 152-166, 2018.

LENINE, E.; LYRA, M. International Relations’ Nomological Machines: The Neo-Neo Synthesis’s Tale of Law-Like Explanations. Colombia Internacional, v. 117, p. 113-137, 2024.

MALINIAK, D.; OAKES, A.; PETERSON, S.; TIERNEY, M. J. International Relations in the US Academy. International Studies Quarterly, v. 55, p. 437-464, 2011.

MEDEIROS, M. De A.; BARNABÉ, I.; ALBUQUERQUE, R.; LIMA, R. What does the field of International Relations look like in South America. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 59, n. 1, e004, 2016.

MORGENTHAU, H. J. A política entre as nações: a luta pelo poder e pela paz. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo e Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, 2003.

NEURATH, O. Protocol Sentences. In: AYER, A. J. Logical Positivism. Nova Iorque: Free Press, p. 199-208, 1959.

NICHOLSON, M. Rationality and the Analysis of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

NICHOLSON, M. The continued significance of positivism?. In: SMITH, S.; BOOTH, K.; ZALEWSKI, M. International Theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 128-145, 1996.

NOVELLI, D. A identidade do campo das Relações Internacionais no Brasil: uma análise a partir da produção científica em seus principais periódicos na década de 2010. Carta Internacional, v. 17, n. 1, e1168, 2022.

PAGE, S. E. The Model Thinker: What You Need to Know to Make Data Work for You. Nova Iorque: Basic Books, 2018.

PATOMÄKI, H. Praxis, politics and the future: a dialectical critical realist account of world-historical causation. Journal of International Relations and Development, v. 20, p. 805-825, 2017.

PATOMÄKI, H. The Promises of Critical Realism in the 2020s and beyond. Teoria Polityki, v. 3, p. 189-200, 2019.

PATOMÄKI, H; WIGHT, C. After Post-Positivism? The Promises of Critical Realism. International Studies Quarterly, v. 44, n. 2, p. 213-237, 2000.

PEARL, J. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

PERES, P. S. Comportamento ou instituições: a evolução histórica do neo-institucionalismo da ciência política. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 23, n. 68, p. 54-71, 2008.

PLATÃO. Parmênides. Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-RIO/Edições Loyola, 2003.

ROSS, D. Game Theory. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition). 2019. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/game-theory/./>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2024.

RUSSELL, B. Logical Atomism. In: AYER, A. J. Logical Positivism. Nova Iorque: Free Press, p. 31-50, 1959.

SALMON, W. C. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

SCHLICK, M. Positivism and Realism. Synthese, v. 7, n. 6–B, p. 478-505, 1948.

SCHLICK, M. The Turning Point in Philosophy. In: AYER, A. J. Logical Positivism. Nova Iorque: Free Press, c p. 53-59, 1959a.

SCHLICK, M. The Foundation of Knowledge. In: AYER, A. J. Logical Positivism. Nova Iorque: Free Press, 1959b. p. 209-227, 1959b.

SCHMIDT, B. C. On the History and Historiography of International Relations. In: CARLSNAES, W.; RISSE, T.; SIMMONS, B. A. Handbook of International Relations. 2. ed. Londres: SAGE, p. 3-28, 2013.

SMITH, S. Positivism and beyond. In: SMITH, S.; BOOTH, K.; ZALEWSKI, M. International Theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 11-44, 1996.

SPIEGELHALTER, D. A Arte da Estatística: Como aprender a partir de dados. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2022.

SUGANAMI, H. On the Causes of War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

SUGANAMI, H. Narrative Explanation and International Relations: Back to Basics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 37, n. 2, p. 327-356, 2008.

WAEVER, O. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In: SMITH, S.; BOOTH, K.; ZALEWSKI, M. International Theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. p. 149-185.

WALT, S. Rigor or Rigor Mortis: Rational Choice and Security Studies. International Security, v. 23, n. 4, p. 5-48, 1999.

WALTZ, K. N. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, IL: Wavelan Press, 2010 [1979].

WENDT, A. On Constitution and Causation in International Relations. Review of International Studies, v. 24, n. 5, p. 101-118, 1998.

WENDT, A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

WIGHT, C. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

WIGHT, C. Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations. In: CARLSNAES, W.; RISSE, T.; SIMMONS, B. A. Handbook of International Relations. 2. ed. Londres: SAGE, p. 29-56, 2013.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. São Paulo: Edusp, 2017.

WOODWARD, J. Making Things Happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

YANOW, D. Thinking Interpretively: Philosophical Presuppositions and the Human Sciences. In: YANOW, D.; SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. 2. ed. Londres: Routledge, p. 5-26, 2015.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-04-03

Como Citar

LENINE, E.; RODRIGUEZ, M. Positivismo reconsiderado: para além dos estereótipos anti-positivistas nas Relações Internacionais. Revista Agenda Política, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 241–265, 2024. DOI: 10.14244/agenda.2023.2.11. Disponível em: https://www.agendapolitica.ufscar.br/index.php/agendapolitica/article/view/867. Acesso em: 18 jun. 2024.